More Choice That's Pukka! ; Simon Jenkins Sainsbury's Is Merely the Latest Giant to Fall Foul of London's New Desire for Diversity and Character On Our High Streets
Evening Standard - London › November 19, 2004
Linked as:
Evening Standard - London › November 19, 2004
Linked as:Summary
SAINSBURY'S has reported its first loss in history. Marks and Spencer is on the ropes. Dixons is in trouble. WH Smith is reeling. What is happening to the high street icons of my youth? Is Sainsbury's to die and could MS really be on the way out?
I knew something was going wrong years ago when I sought the way to the Selfridges sportswear department. Which designer do you want, asked the information desk. How should I know? Last month I had the same experience in Bloomingdales in New York. I was seeking a raincoat. Which designer, sir?See the full content of this document
Extract
More Choice That's Pukka! ; Simon Jenkins Sainsbury's Is Merely the Latest Giant to Fall Foul of London's New Desire for Diversity and Character On Our High Streets
There was no such thing as a Bloomingdales raincoat. This was no longer a department store but a shopping mall. It was a warren of unending stalls, a nightmare of garish faces pleading to sell me things I did not want, yet denying me a simple coa...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United Kingdom
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Jason Is Fired Up for Forest Clash | has this mother of three changed the face of british education? furious at her son s struggle to get into a gram... | Besiktas Set to Enter the Race for Kalou ; the Screamer ... It's the Talk of Football Edited by Simon Jones | man released after child filming probe | 48 CFR 252.217-7025 - Containers and equipment. | bronson v la crosse & milwaukie r co. 69 u.s 283 2 wall 283 1864 | waller et al. v. state-highway department., 218 ga. 605, 129 s.e.2.d 772 (1963) | kellibrew v the state. 239 ga app 783 521 s.e.2d 921 1999